Australia has extended their equivalent graduate route visa to 3 years allowing graduates more time to start their career and making it easier for students to apply for replacement visas that expired during the pandemic. Further, remote learning is recognised as counting towards their graduate visa. This goes hand in hand with their expansion of high-quality higher education into online and offshore markets, not feeling as strong a need for face-to-face teachings as the UK and giving their international students more flexibility of what location to study from. The focus is on getting an Australian education and retaining the graduates for employment in the country over ensuring the students are studying in person and the mode of delivery.
With Employability, in Australia there is no support or encouragement for institutions to increase career advice and support for graduates on employability. Instead, the strategy focuses on the Work Integrated Learning and encouraging students to study subjects connected to employer needs, and giving them the tools (visa, skillset, etc.) needed to gain employment.
With data collection and measuring success, Australia and the UK both rely on good data collection to track institutional and international student success and place a need for this data. The UK noted a need for enhancing the evidence base of recent international graduates with the help of UUKi and BUILA building a major international graduate survey, as well as OfS working with HESA to improve the quality and reliability of the current Graduate Outcomes (something that will be negatively impacted by HESA ceasing calls to international numbers, despite this importance for data being noted in the strategy). Australia goes one step further, using its government-funded graduate surveys to measure not only the number of international students employed or enrolled in further education, but also measures the improvement of student satisfaction through the Student Experience Survey. These two measurements, measured through the data gathered from these surveys, make up the three-part measurement used to determine Australia’s success in international education. In contrast to the UK specific numerical targets, Australia’s targets are focused more on continual growth, measured through their multiple student and graduate surveys.
On international student integration and internationalisation, the UK focuses mostly on the financial benefits of the international students, both for institutions and labour market retention. There is less of an emphasis on the wellbeing of the student and the benefits these international students bring to the local students’ intercultural understanding as there is in Australia, and such international experiences are seen to stem more from outward mobility and living in another country over direct contact with international students. However, the UK still values the impact of UK students on the international students and the contribution international students make to the culture and labour market, and so it looks at how we can better support them under Action 5 of the IES, not only in employability needs, but also what the local students gain from studying with international students and how to increase quality integration into the local community and society.